A superficial view of Parliament.
In my opinion, this is what gave rise to governments and parliaments: individuals wanted to give up part of their authority so they wouldn't have to decide everything on their own and risk making hard decisions.
Unfortunately, many people choose their representative in parliament or other authorities with even less thought than they do an automobile insurance policy, which degrades these institutions.
Last updated 3 mins ago
I struggled a lot with brokering sales at first after switching to a single supplier. But then I learned through experience that most people do not like to make choices or make final decisions.
Choice without a choice.
At first, I was sold a product, and I described the qualities, advantages, and disadvantages of this product. I also explained the nuances and convinced the company to make the purchase.
Then I already had several of these products, and it seemed to me that if I described the advantages and disadvantages of these products and indicated the prices, then the buyer would be happy to make a choice, but sales were not frequent, and buyers left and bought the same products at the same price, but from other sellers, and this depressed me terribly.
This made me lazy in my work; I no longer made five or ten proposals but only one and only described its advantages. Strangely enough, things began to change and sales started growing, and while communicating with other sellers, I found out that they observed the same thing.
As it is now, is it right?
A superficial view of Parliament.
In my opinion, this is what gave rise to governments and parliaments: individuals wanted to give up part of their authority so they wouldn't have to decide everything on their own and risk making hard decisions.
Unfortunately, many people choose their representative in parliament or other authorities with even less thought than they do an automobile insurance policy, which degrades these institutions.
Trofim Eremenko
CEO ITdt.dev
